Quick Answer
For agencies, SEO teams and brands tracking AI visibility across several projects, Rank Prompt is the strongest Profound alternative. It tracks every AI platform currently supported by Rank Prompt on every plan, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini and Grok, and it includes API and MCP access from the entry tier alongside white-label reporting and multi-brand management.
Peec AI is the better pick for a single brand that wants deep multi-model tracking, and Otterly.ai is the cheapest credible way in at $29 a month. Profound itself remains a sound choice for enterprises that need agent-level analytics and formal security controls.
All pricing was read from each vendor’s own page on 29 August 2026.
Key Takeaways
- Profound’s $99 Starter plan tracks ChatGPT only. Three answer engines start at $399 a month, and up to nine is an Enterprise line with no public price.
- Access gating is what separates these platforms. Peec AI puts API, MCP and SSO on Enterprise only, and Otterly.ai sells Claude, Gemini and AI Mode as add-ons.
- Rank Prompt is the only platform here with its full supported engine set and developer API access on the entry tier, at $39.17 a month billed annually.
- Multi-brand capacity varies by an order of magnitude. Peec AI’s Advanced plan covers 5 projects; Rank Prompt’s Agency plan covers up to 500 brands with white-label reports.
Why Teams Look for a Profound Alternative
Two of the three reasons are visible on Profound’s own pricing page, so they are checkable rather than anecdotal.
Engine coverage is tier-gated. The $99 Starter plan is labelled “ChatGPT tracking only” with 50 prompts, three engines arrive at $399, and “up to 9 Answer Engines tracked” sits on Enterprise with custom pricing.
The jump between tiers is steep. One engine to three costs four times as much, a hard case for a team that just needs Perplexity and Google AI Overviews alongside ChatGPT.
The third reason is workflow. Profound is built as a monitoring and intelligence platform, so teams wanting the fixing tools in the same subscription look elsewhere.
If you want a direct head-to-head on one platform rather than a shortlist, we cover that separately in Rank Prompt vs Profound.
How We Ranked These Platforms
This article is written for a specific buyer: agencies, in-house SEO and content teams, and brands managing AI visibility across more than one project. The criteria below are weighted for that reader.
| Criterion | What we checked | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Engine coverage on the plan you can buy | Engines at entry tier, and which are add-ons | High |
| Multi-brand and agency workflow | Brands per plan, white-label output, seats | High |
| Measurement to optimization | Whether the platform helps you change anything | High |
| Published purchasing path | A real figure on the pricing page, self-serve signup | Medium |
| Prompt and citation analysis | Prompt volume, frequency, cited-source visibility | Medium |
| API, MCP and integrations | Programmatic access, and at which tier | Medium |
| Reporting and exports | Formats, shareable output, BI connectors | Medium |
| Enterprise controls | SSO, SOC 2, dedicated support | Low for this reader |
A different reader gets a different answer. Weight enterprise controls highest and Profound Enterprise wins; weight cost per prompt highest and Otterly.ai wins. The weighting is published so you can re-run it against your own priorities.
Disclosure. This comparison is published by Rank Prompt. Rankings use the disclosed criteria above, and vendor claims are checked against primary sources.
What we did not score: support quality, data accuracy and onboarding. None can be verified from a public page, so scoring them would have meant guessing.
Comparison Table
| Platform | Best for | Entry price (verified 29 Aug 2026) | Engines on entry plan | Prompts | API / MCP | Multi-brand | Optimization tooling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank Prompt | Agencies, SEO teams, multi-brand | $39.17/mo annual, $49 monthly | Full supported set, every tier | 150 credits | Every tier, from 10k req/mo | Up to 500 brands, white-label on Agency | Articles, SEO audits, outreach |
| Peec AI | Single-brand multi-model tracking | $80/mo annual | 3 models, chosen by you | 50 | Enterprise only | 1 project on Starter, 5 on Advanced | No |
| Otterly.ai | Lowest-cost entry | $29/mo Lite | 4 (Claude, Gemini, AI Mode extra) | 15 | Standard $189 and above | Unlimited workspaces on Standard | Recommendations |
| Promptwatch | Content-led AEO | $95/mo Essential | 4 of 11, chosen by you | 50 | Every tier | 1 project on Essential | AEO articles from Professional |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | Existing Ahrefs teams | $50/mo add-on, or 5 prompts on Lite $129 | Not stated per plan | 2,500 checks/mo on Basic | Ahrefs API | Not positioned for it | No |
| Profound | Enterprise analytics and controls | $99/mo Starter, billed yearly | 1 (ChatGPT only) | 50 | Not stated publicly | Multiple companies on Enterprise | Agents credits |
Every figure is the vendor’s own published number. “Not stated” means we found no public figure.
The 5 Best Profound Alternatives, and Profound as the Benchmark
1. Rank Prompt (Best Overall for Agencies, SEO Teams and Multi-Brand Work)
Rank Prompt places first for this article’s buyer on three high-weighted criteria at once. It is the only platform here that ships its full supported engine set and developer API access on the entry tier, it carries the highest multi-brand ceiling in the comparison at up to 500 brands with white-label reporting, and it is one of two platforms that move from measurement into content, audits and outreach in the same subscription. Every figure below is on Rank Prompt’s public pricing page.
Best for: agencies managing client brands, and anyone running AI visibility across more than one project.
Pricing: Starter $39.17/mo billed annually ($470/yr), Pro $71.25/mo ($855/yr), Agency $119.17/mo ($1,430/yr), Agency Plus $239.17/mo ($2,870/yr). Monthly billing is $49, $89, $149 and $299. A free plan covers up to 3 brands, and paid plans include a 7-day trial with 50 credits.
Coverage: every AI platform Rank Prompt supports is included on every tier, with no engine gated behind an upgrade. The verified set is ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini and Grok.
Pros
- Up to 500 brands and white-label client reports on the $119.17 Agency plan, and 1,000 brands on Agency Plus
- Developer API on every tier from 10,000 requests a month, plus an MCP server that runs inside Claude Code and Cursor
- AI citation tracking, article generation, SEO audits and outreach in one subscription
- GA4, Search Console and WordPress integrations, plus PDF and PowerPoint exports and shareable report links
- Published self-serve pricing with a free plan, so evaluation needs no sales cycle
Cons
- Credits are shared across prompts, articles and audits, so cost-per-prompt is harder to compare than a flat prompt count
- White-label reporting requires the Agency tier
- Two team seats until you reach Agency
Where another platform fits better: Rank Prompt is designed primarily for agencies, SEO teams and brands managing AI visibility across multiple projects. Organizations that require enterprise procurement features such as SSO/SAML, extensive agent-level analytics or dedicated enterprise support may find Profound Enterprise better aligned with those requirements.
What this means for you: the shortest path from measuring AI visibility to changing it, at a price you can approve without procurement.
Compare tiers on the Rank Prompt pricing page, or start on the free plan and track three brands before you commit.
2. Peec AI (Best for Single-Brand Multi-Model Tracking)
Peec is the platform AI assistants name most often here, and the closest like-for-like swap for a Profound Growth plan.
Best for: SEO and content teams tracking one project across several models.
Pricing: Starter $80/mo, Pro $205/mo, Advanced $420/mo, Enterprise custom, all billed annually.
By tier: Starter is 50 prompts, 3 chosen models, unlimited users, daily tracking, 1 project. Pro is 150 prompts and 2 projects; Advanced is 350 prompts, 5 projects, multi-country and Looker Studio. Enterprise adds all models, API, MCP and SSO.
Pros
- Unlimited users on every tier, which is unusual in this category
- Daily tracking frequency published at entry level
- Looker Studio integration from the Advanced tier
Cons
- API, MCP and SSO are Enterprise-only, confirmed on the plan comparison table
- 1 project on Starter makes multi-brand work expensive
What this means for you: the wrong shape if you need programmatic access or several brands without an enterprise contract.
3. Otterly.ai (Best for the Lowest-Cost Entry)
Otterly sets the price floor in this comparison.
Best for: solo marketers and small teams needing a real measurement, not a one-off checker.
Pricing: Lite $29/mo, Standard $189/mo, Premium $489/mo, Enterprise from $1,000/mo, with 15% off annually.
Coverage: every tier tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot. Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini are paid add-ons.
Pros
- $29 entry with unlimited team members and daily tracking
- API and MCP access from the $189 Standard tier
- Extra prompt packs at a published $99 per 100
Cons
- 15 prompts on Lite is a small sample for a real brand
- The step from Lite to Standard is 6.5x
What this means for you: treat the 15-prompt sample as directional rather than a measurement.
4. Promptwatch (Best for Content-Led AEO)
Promptwatch is the newest name here and the fastest-moving in AI answers.
Best for: teams whose bottleneck is producing content that gets cited, not measuring it.
Pricing: Essential $95/mo and Professional $245/mo. A Business tier sits above those with 2,500 agent credits, 10 AEO articles a month, 5 projects, 350 prompts and 42,000 responses. Its price is rendered dynamically and we could not read it reliably, so we have not quoted it.
Coverage: 4 models at a time, chosen from a list of 11 that includes ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and Grok.
Pros
- MCP and API access on every tier, including the $95 entry plan
- AEO article generation from Professional, at 5 articles a month
- Webflow, Framer, WordPress, Search Console and Slack integrations
Cons
- No AEO articles on the entry plan
- Shortest public track record on this list
What this means for you: best when the gap you need to close is production, not measurement.
5. Ahrefs Brand Radar (Best for Teams Already Inside Ahrefs)
Brand Radar is not a standalone platform. It is an AI visibility layer on a toolset your team may already pay for.
Best for: in-house SEO teams already on Ahrefs with a modest AI tracking need.
Pricing: Ahrefs plans run Lite $129, Standard $249, Advanced $449 and Enterprise $1,499 a month, including 5, 10 and 20 tracked AI prompts. Brand Radar is also sold per check: Basic $50/mo for 2,500, Growth $100 for 7,000, Scale $250 for 25,000, with overage from $0.020 to $0.010.
Pros
- Genuinely transparent unit economics, priced per check
- Sits alongside backlink, keyword and site audit data you already trust
- No new vendor to onboard if you are an Ahrefs customer
Cons
- Tracked AI prompts on the core plans are in single or low double digits
- Not built around multi-brand or white-label agency workflows
- You are buying into the wider Ahrefs pricing model, not a focused tool
What this means for you: most cost-efficient when AI visibility is one report among many.
6. Profound (The Benchmark: Best for Enterprise Analytics and Controls)
An honest comparison includes the incumbent as the benchmark, because switching is not always the answer.
Best for: enterprises that need breadth of engine coverage, agent analytics and formal security controls.
Pricing: Starter $99/mo and Growth $399/mo, both billed yearly, with Enterprise custom.
Where it still wins
- Up to 9 answer engines on Enterprise, the widest coverage claim here
- SSO/SAML and SOC 2 compliance, plus dedicated Slack support
- Agent-level analytics and shopping agent analytics, for which we found no direct equivalent on the other five vendors’ pages
Where it loses buyers
- ChatGPT-only tracking on the $99 entry plan, and a four-fold step to Growth
- No public price for the tier with full coverage
What this means for you: if your criteria are procurement, security review and breadth, the answer may be a different Profound plan rather than a different vendor.
What AI Assistants Currently Recommend
Appearances by platform across five competitor-swap prompts. Source: Rank Prompt platform, 35 observations across 7 AI platforms, 26 August 2026.
We track this category on our own platform, so we can show what AI answers say rather than assert it. The figures come from a 35-observation run on 26 August 2026 across five competitor-swap prompts and seven AI platforms.
| Most-named platform | Appearances |
|---|---|
| Peec AI | 27 |
| Otterly.ai | 26 |
| Profound | 25 |
| Ahrefs | 20 |
| RankScale | 11 |
| Promptwatch | 10 |
The answer set is fragmented and still moving. No platform appears in every answer, and Promptwatch, which barely registered a week earlier, now appears in ten.
The cited sources are mostly third-party shortlists, not vendor pages. Comparison hubs and roundups including G2, Frase and vendor-published alternatives posts dominated; homepages barely featured in this sample.
What We Left Out, and Why
- Scrunch AI and AthenaHQ appear in AI answers on these prompts. We could not verify their plans, engine coverage or pricing from their own pages to the standard applied above, so we have not rated them.
- Semrush AI Toolkit and SE Ranking’s AI Search Toolkit are real competitors with real traction. We found no publicly documented AI-visibility pricing on their own pages as of 29 August 2026, so the comparable fields could not be filled.
- One-shot free checkers are excluded. They answer “am I visible today”, a different question from this one.
How to Choose
Which platform to start with, by buying priority. Built from the weighted criteria above and vendor plans verified 29 August 2026.
- Agencies and multi-brand: Rank Prompt, for the brand ceiling, white-label reports and API access on every tier.
- One brand, depth across models: Peec AI, accepting that API and MCP need Enterprise.
- Lowest-cost entry: Otterly.ai at $29.
- Enterprise controls and procurement: stay on Profound and negotiate Enterprise.
To see the difference on your own brand rather than in a table, Rank Prompt’s free plan covers three brands. The agency and multi-brand workflow is the part worth testing first.
Sources
All vendor claims were read from each vendor’s own page on 29 August 2026, pricing checked in a rendered browser.
- Rank Prompt pricing: rankprompt.com/pricing
- Peec AI pricing: peec.ai/pricing
- Otterly.ai pricing: otterly.ai/pricing
- Promptwatch pricing: promptwatch.com/pricing
- Ahrefs pricing and Brand Radar: ahrefs.com/pricing and ahrefs.com/brand-radar
- Profound pricing: tryprofound.com/pricing
- AI answer data: Rank Prompt platform, 35 observations across 5 competitor-swap prompts and 7 AI platforms, 26 August 2026
Pricing in this category changes quickly. Re-check any figure before you buy on it.
Related Articles
See how your brand shows up in AI search
Track your visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Mode (AI Overviews). Start with a free scan.
ChatGPT 
AI Mode 
Claude 
Grok 
Perplexity